If You Were PaperMaster What Would You Do?

Okay you're a genius engineer, considered one of the premier chip designers with IBM. You're so good in fact that you became vice president of microprocessor technology development in IBM. But you happen to have so much more potential, so Apple across the street offer you a position as well. Steve Jobs' company offers you a vice president position for device hardware engineering.



Possibly there was a lot of fine print here not mentioned in the news but one thing led to another and you take the position with Apple - probably more money.

But when you start your first day, you get the shock of your life - you get sued! IBM claims that you have violated prior employment agreement by accepting a position at a competitor and may divulge IBM's trade secrets to Apple.

This is what happened to Mark Papermaster. He has reportedly has authored several papers on PowerPC chip development and is considered a "top expert in Power architecture and technology." Papermaster's expertise in system design--putting together the entire package of processor, chipset, and the rest of the guts that form a computer--could serve him well at a company that prides itself on soup-to-nuts design.

It's such a shame as Steve Jobs had such high praises for this guy. “Mark is a seasoned leader and is going to be an excellent addition to our senior management team,” said Steve Jobs, Apple’s CEO.

So now he's in big trouble. Wonder if he gets paid? That's like being in between a rock and hard place. Management sure is a difficult spot to be in. It's not like you're just an engineer, but being in a position like that allows you permission to privy information/ sensitive information that makes it complicated in what may otherwise be such simple terms as work transition

Microsoft's and Apple's Approaches To Security Disclosures - The Carpet Bomb Case, Microsoft Says Stop Using Safari

This shows how 2 companies can be very different in approaching dilemmas. I guess it's company culture combined with executive decisiveness.

I do not criticize Apple for being the way they are. It's great to come clean about a problem and say, "Yes we have a problem and yes we have the solution." But it doesn't help in the interim if it takes 3 months to find the answers.

I also see Microsoft's point of coming forward early in the game and calling out the competition. We all know something is wrong with Safari and they have acknowledged that Safari coupled with Windows poses a very vulnerable spot for users versus hackers.

This article in Computer World quotes nCircle's Storms, "Microsoft has really embraced the enterprise, and decided that disclosure and a regular patch schedule is what the enterprise needs to support and maintain its products.

"Apple, on the other hand, appeals to consumers, and believes that for the majority of consumers, issuing an advisory without a patch would probably just create FUD [fear, uncertainty and doubt]," Storms concluded.

As Storms noted, Apple has remained silent on the Safari carpet bomb problem. Last week, it did not respond to a request for comment on its security team's decision against adding a user-approval option to Safari. The company was not available Saturday.

Microsoft did say that it was working with its rival, however. "[We] are working with our colleagues at Apple to investigate the issue," said Tim Rains, a product manager in Microsoft's malware protection center, in a post to the MSRC blog.

No timetable has been set by Microsoft for patching its software to block combined Safari-IE attacks. As it often does in security advisories, the company only said that it may issue a patch.

Well now I'm glad I'm using Mozilla Firefox instead of the reportedly bugged Safari and Internet Explorer.