Yahoo Dumped Microsoft Buy-out For Google Non-Exclusive Partnership. Has the Courtship Ended? Or is it just beginning?

Yahoo has finally made their call. They have finally said "NO" to Microsoft. Yes Microsoft got dumped. Yahoo didn't want a buy-out or maybe they did, but they just didn't think Microsoft's offer was good enough.

What they have done instead is partnered with Google. They have ceded their search capacity to Google. So right now, the ads that will come out on Yahoo are essentially Google ads. That's what it means.

The business strategy here being that revenues could potentially increase for Yahoo search. However the flip-side is that this gives Google even more power in the market. It's now closing into monopoly if I may say so myself as Google supplies other smaller search engines like Ask.com

CNet reports that Yahoo expects the revenue to help the company invest in its dual-pronged advertising strategy that's designed to offer advertisers an easy ability to buy text ads on search results and to buy graphical "display" ads elsewhere on Yahoo's considerable Internet properties.

"This agreement provides a source of funds to both deliver financial value to stockholders from search monetization and to invest in our broader strategy to transform display advertising and advance our starting-point objectives with users," Yahoo President Sue Decker said in a statement. "It enhances competition by promoting our ability to compete in the marketplace where we are especially well-positioned: in the convergence of search and display."

Under the deal, Yahoo will select the search terms for which Google will supply ads, the companies said. The ads will be displayed in the United States and Canada, and Decker took pains to say how Yahoo controls which Google results are displayed and when.

Yahoo's search ad engine, Panama, is competitive with Google's for many popular queries, but Yahoo plans to use Google with less common searches, Decker said. "Yahoo monetizes very competitively with Google for query ads but is not as competitive in the tail," she said, referring to the long statistical tail consisting of a large number of infrequent searches.

Dissension Within The Ranks - Ask.com

There is said to be dissension within the ranks of Ask.com, with Barry Diller - Ask.com's CEO believing that Ask.com needs better high profile advertising while Jim Safka who used to run Match.com and ran the famous campaign featuring Dr. Phil McGraw stands for his premise that it would be more beneficial for Ask.com to develop the core search engine as well as creating flashy features that will differentiate it from the other big players in the search market like Google and Yahoo.

This disagreement among executives causes a confusion of company direction from budgeting for infrastructure and staff direction. It has been said in a New York Times article that there was always a clash about everything from how much to spend on engineers and servers to the design of their logos to the scripts of their commercials.

This is very dangerous for a company. If there is no unison in terms of goals and direction then the company is only heading towards a downward spiral.

Management Advice For Yahoo

Many have made it a big deal how Yahoo has become so deep in trouble with regards to legal issues and other management concerns. Here are some advice from analysts and opinionated individuals as reported by Businessweek.com

1. Bernstein Research analyst Jeffrey Lindsay advised in a Jan. 11 report that Yahoo fire 2,000 employees. He said that would give Yahoo more profits to pursue initiatives such as mobile search and video as well as acquisitions. The company is mulling layoffs, but more in the range of hundreds of employees. Deeper cuts, flagged privately by people at Yahoo as unlikely, sound more like wishful thinking by investors than sound advice. They presume that Yahoo is stumbling toward death's door when it's not: In its fourth-quarter report Jan. 29, the company is expected to show a 15% gain in sales, to $1.4 billion, though profits are expected to fall.
   

   Yahoo's major acquisitions over the past year, such as Right Media, BlueLithium, and Zimbra, surely created redundant positions. If they haven't been eliminated already, it's time.
   
   

2. Lindsay and others also think Yahoo should give up on its search efforts and just pay Google to drive its search engine. It's easy to understand why. Yahoo keeps losing search market share to Google, whose engine handles from 56% to 66% of all queries, depending on who's counting. By contrast, Yahoo's share is usually from 18% to 21%. "The text-ad war has been lost," says Scott Rafer, CEO of ad network Lookery and former CEO of MyBlogLog, which Yahoo bought a year ago.

   But others think Yahoo would be crazy to cede such an important front, not to mention control of the Web's most lucrative advertising opportunity. "It's a pretty critical component of getting people to start with Yahoo and stay there," says Ned May, director and lead analyst at market researcher Outsell. Just as important, data from searches, still the most important indication of a user's intention to buy, ultimately may prove crucial for targeting display ads to individuals as well.

   Notably, marketers and ad firms are rooting for Yahoo because they want a stronger No. 2 just to keep Google honest. "I would hate to see Google become almost a monopoly," says Lee. If Yahoo can keep making even mild progress in search advertising—its revenue per search rose 20% in the third quarter—keeping it in-house seems worthwhile.

3. If there's one rumor that keeps coming back again and again, it's this one. And with every replay, the speculation seems ever more driven by investors looking for a quick exit than by any actual deliberations by Yahoo or Microsoft. The software giant, which only last year spent the most it has ever put into an acquisition with the $6 billion purchase of aQuantive, seems unlikely to put up the upwards of $27 billion it would take to buy Yahoo. Such a deal would also carry big risks, as the merged company would likely lose even more ground to Google in the time it would take to integrate Yahoo's and Microsoft's operations and businesses.



4. In an impassioned call on the blog GigaOm on Jan. 22, Mitra advised Yahoo to forget about downsizing and "please put up a fight." She said Yahoo has an unmatched opportunity on the emerging new Web, which she views as being dominated by highly specialized services. So, she advises, Yahoo should consider buying jobs site Monster.com (MNST) to complement Yahoo HotJobs, photo service Shutterfly to go with Yahoo's Flickr site, travel sites such as Expedia (EXPE) or Priceline (PCLN) and more, to fill out the portal's strengths in these specialized markets.

   Problem is, Yahoo doesn't seem to have the resources to get this aggressive. Its cash position of $2.2 billion trails laughably behind Google's $13 billion stash and Microsoft's $19 billion trove. And the stock market clearly isn't valuing Yahoo's shares enough to make them a powerful currency for deals. As much as Yang may want to follow this path, it's unlikely he can.